By industry
The firm's memory, not the partner's.
Precedent- and document-driven, with real malpractice exposure — and a business whose product is knowledge that currently walks out of the door at six o'clock.
What goes wrong today
The problem in legal & law firms
- What the firm knows about a client, a matter or a position lives in the heads of the people who ran it. When they move, it leaves.
- A retrieved passage can carry a qualifier the summary drops. In advice, that is not an inconvenience; it is exposure.
- Matter history, precedent and know-how are spread across a document management system nobody enjoys searching, so the same work is done twice.
- Conflicts, undertakings and dated obligations are tracked by diligence and memory rather than by the system.
What you would do with it
The same platform, pointed at your problem
Precedent and position, cited
Ask what the firm's position is and get an answer with the matter, the author and the date attached — not a folder of documents to read.
Onboarding that takes days
A new joiner's assistant already knows how the firm works, what it has advised, and where the standing positions are.
Scope that travels with the advice
A position taken for one jurisdiction or one client cannot come back as though it applied to another, because its scope is part of the fact.
Client confidentiality by construction
Compartmentalisation and classification are how access works. Matters stay separated by design.
What changes
In terms your finance director recognises
Institutional memory that survives departures
Less rework on questions the firm has already answered
Advice you can trace to its basis, months later
The lead angle here is recall and institutional memory — but the platform underneath is the same one on every page of this site. See how it works.
Other industries
Start with one team.
Small teams use Cornerstone free. No card, no sales call, nobody to approve it.